John Shutt wrote: > Because ABC/Disney owns ESPN, Fox owns Fox Sports and Fox News, > NBC owns CNBC and MSNBC, and CBS owns Showtime, and through it's > parent corporation National Amusements still has ties to all of > the Viacom channels including the MTV networks. > > Given that, what incentive do the national networks have in > luring viewers away from DBS/Cable? What about station groups? Or independents? Even the network-owned stations would benefit from attracting those who won't go to subscription services, such as me. And would have a greater chance of making me loyal if they offered a mix of programs that would lure me away from other local OTA stations. I already offered a different model from what we have now, as a possible solution to this dilemma. It would be one where the content providers, including the local broadcasters, pay the neutral cable and DBS companies for carriage, but get all the ad revenues. Then these content sources would more obviously see the benefits of as many carriage media as they could use. Including their own OTA plants. Because really, aside from such a change, the FCC and its mandates are the only ally OTA TV users have these days. Sad to say that something like OTA TV should rely only on govt mandates, but it seems to be the case. Which is why the Fox complaint about the FCC-mandated public service announcements sounds so lame to me. The "voluntary efforts" have so far been close to nonexistent, to be quite honest. From my perspective anyway. Even the "available in HD" banner is misleading to most viewers. From their experience at the vast majority of stores, this banner means simply "if you buy cable or DBS and pay extra." Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.