[AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?
- From: Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Arocket List <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 10:58:42 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 27 Apr 2023, roxanna Mason wrote:
That's probably the reason, so the Saturn 1 stage one was beforeĀ all the
others?
Yes, the S-I (first stage of the Saturn I) was originally the Juno V, a
quick-and-dirty ground demo project -- hence existing engines fed by a
bundle of existing tanks -- with only vague notions of what upper stages
would go on it if/when it flew. In fact there were three different series
of concepts for that: the Saturn A variants put existing rockets on top
of the S-I, the Saturn B concepts had new upper stages with conventional
fuels and existing engines, and the Saturn C series was more advanced
concepts. (The Saturn V was originally the Saturn C-5.) A high-level
NASA advisory committee eventually sold everyone on liquid-hydrogen upper
stages, and the history of the C series got complicated while the A and B
series were quietly forgotten.
Henry
Other related posts:
- » [AR] APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Terry McCreary
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Terry McCreary
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- John DeMar
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- David Summers
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Matthew JL
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- George Herbert
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- kevin ward
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- jake
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Troy Prideaux
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- John Dom
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Troy Prideaux
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Troy Prideaux
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Henry Spencer
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- roxanna Mason
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Troy Prideaux
- » [AR] Re: APCP properties, was Re: Re: starship abort?- Ben Brockert