Let me not get into which is best.. Fedora or Ubuntu.. Both need to
encouraged.. If fedora has flaws please take efforts to get that flaw
out.. If Ubuntu has flaws i would like to convey we are one small
recognised LocoTeam who can take some efforts atleast...
Well, if internet conectivity and download features are criterias for an
OS to flourish, how did windows florish? (Offcourse Piracy is the best
possible answer)
Remember, Windows OS alone is provided any where. U need to stretch to
get Office Suite. U need to make efforts to get real player work in
windows. One has to do much much much more to configure an IIS up and
running...
Look on the other hand Ubuntu comes with most common applications a
normal user can expect. And always mirrors are readily available and
the LUGs like us.
Also the complete satisfaction that I am gonna stretch for a Legal Copy
of a G(PL)enuine Software and not a pirated version of a proprietory
one... We beleive these reasons are enough to convince users...
Its a matter of time before the most commonly required softwares for
Ubuntu is made available to public (through any means).. The seperate CD
move of Ubuntu Indian Team is a good move towards this...
Toufeeq Hussain wrote:
On 10/25/06, mbchandar@xxxxxxxxx <mbchandar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
check out
http://fedoraproject.org/static-tmp/
The FC guys need to crank up their hype-machine. When Ubuntu released
, they whole geek-world was talking about it. Look at the way FC6 (a
very good release going by the features) gets released. Hardly any
noise.
I remember the same thing happened when RedHat was a free(gratis)
distro and each RH release was welcomed by huge fanfare and every
Slackware release was greeted by dead-silence.
-Toufeeq