[opendtv] Re: Analog v Digital TV

  • From: "Albert Manfredi" <bert22306@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:33:03 -0500

Al Limberg wrote:

Analog TV has limited fine-line resolution, but very high
edge-positioning resolution in the horizontal.  So, it is not
susceptible to the jaggies that really offend the human visual
system.

The redundancy in slow moving analog TV signals allows
noise to average out over a few frames, so the redundancy
is sometimes useful and not really wasted.  Video compression
takes away this safety net, so other ways to reduce the
effects of noise must be employed.

On the redundancy, while MPEG compression deliberately takes that away to save on bandwidth, Reed-Solomon and Viterbi/turbo codes actually restore it. So it's a mixed bag in digital.

But I think the good news is that the when errors are corrected in digital, they are usually completely imperceptible. Whereas in analog, they are often or usually merely tolerable.

I suppose one should expect that whatever techniques are used to control error rates, as long as these techniques are different, each will have its specific advantages and disadvantages compared with the others.

Bert

_________________________________________________________________
Communicate instantly! Use your Hotmail address to sign into Windows Live Messenger now. http://get.live.com/messenger/overview



----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:

- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word 
unsubscribe in the subject line.

Other related posts: