I think the officially recognized policy is they would prefer to eat their children first. Anything else involves losing control of spectrum. - Tom John Shutt wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Manfredi, Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>The question then would be, what would existing OTA >>broadcasters prefer? Non-TV squatters on their spectrum, >>or more OTA competition? >> >>Bert > > > The proposal I saw was for 'intelligent' receivers to detect when a channel > was in use and then move to an unoccupied space. Since many OTA > broadcasters go off the air at night, I would hope that the in-use channel > detecting would be an ongoing process for the Wi-Fi devices. > > Just as Burger King, McDonalds, and Wendy's always cluster together, more > OTA competition would almost always be better for broadcasters in general. > With USDTV and others on the horizon, more OTA capacity is going to be in > demand. > > John > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.