Craig Birkmaier wrote: > >So while this concept of allowing non-TV RF users to > >pick up unused bands might be technically valid, it > >should be also legally and technically possible for > >broadcasters to install more OTA stations, and use > >the spectrum they were assigned more completely? > > Only with properly designed, spectrally efficient networks. If we > stay the course, these alternative, very low power uses of the taboo > channels will continue to be the only viable option. If we merely stay the course, many the frequencies now assigned to NTSC, and an additional allocation of UHF channels, would be available for new stations. Ultimately, if it's true that low-powered non-TV services can be introduced in that spectrum, it's hard to argue that low- powered TV stations wouldn't equally be possible in that same spectrum. > Protecting the status quo is the whole point of this farce that we=20 > are calling a DTV transition. A far better way to preserve the status quo would have been not to have a transition at all. But it's fairly obvious that many broadcasters are *putting up with* the transition only to preserve some semblance of status quo. Where "status quo" means "OTA is only there for show, but it does give me access to cable rights." A pity, especially in light of the success of freeview systems in Europe. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.