[opendtv] Re: FCC irrelevent??
- From: dan.grimes@xxxxxxxx
- To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:12:33 -0700
"I agree fully with what you have written, but few other people will. They
will say this is old fashioned thinking, like what the FCC used to do
before the rape, er, revisions of the 1934 communications act. The curent
purpose of the FCC is to do both the things you say it should not. This is
sort of like Fascism, don't you think?" -cbenham
I would agree if it weren't for the fact that we have a Congress, that is
representation, that votes in the Acts. If the people want the FCC to act
that way, then that is what it is to be. But if we don't want the FCC to
act that way, how do we convince our Congress that in fact we want the FCC
to go a different direction? It would take convincing our Representatives
the need to enact new guidelines. Is this possible to do with special
interests so easily attaining the Representative's attention. So then one
might argue that if our representation is not functional, perhaps it is
Fascism.
I take it that there is a large majority out there that in fact want the
FCC to be both a fund raiser to the government and a business partner for
the corporations?
Dan Grimes
cbenham@xxxxxxxxx
et To: opendtv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: cc:
opendtv-bounce@fr Subject: [opendtv] Re: FCC
irrelevent??
eelists.org
10/25/2005 11:51
AM
Please respond to
opendtv
>
> "We are advocating efficient use of the spectrum by everyone, not
exclusive
> use of the spectrum by a few conglomerates with a business to protect."
> -Craig Birkmaier
>
> Wasn't the FCC established to protect the spectrum from the vary thing
that
> is happening? So in other words, it is not that the FCC should be
> dismantled, but rather it should be overhauled, so as to provide the most
> public benefit of the spectrum.
>
> Which then begs the question, what should the role of the FCC be and not
> be? I haven't really put much thought into this list, but here is what I
> don't think the FCC should be doing:
>
> 1. A source of revenue for the government to spend on non-related
> projects.
> 2. A special interest group service provider.
>
> What it should be doing:
>
> 1. Managing the spectrum so that frequencies don't overlap, allowing for
> reliable and organized use.
> 2. Allocate spectrum to provide public benefit. This public benefit can
> be defined several ways: service provision, economic stimulus, safety
> services, etc.
> 3. Police action against those that would counter public benefit with
self
> interest.
>
> First, agree or disagree with these? What else should they be doing or
> shouldn't be doing?
>
I agree fully with what you have written, but few other people will.
They will say this is old fashioned thinking, like what the FCC used to do
before
the rape, er, revisions of the 1934 communications act .
The curent purpose of the FCC is to do both the things you say it should
not.
This is sort of like Fascism, don't you think?
> Second, how do we get the FCC to do what they are supposed to do and step
> away from roles they should not be doing?
>
> Third, if they do what they should be doing, do we still want them to go
> away?
>
> Dan Grimes
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: image/gif
-- File: graycol.gif
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: image/gif
-- File: ecblank.gif
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: image/gif
-- File: pic07605.gif
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways:
- Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at
FreeLists.org
- By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
unsubscribe in the subject line.
Other related posts: