Craig wrote: >broadcasters would have little choice but to compete, and would be >placed in the "terrible" position of having to take some of their >billions in profits to re-invent their business model. Let me *again* remind you that one size does not fit all when referring to broadcasters, as you continue to do while sounding like a broken record. "Broadcasters" fitting your model are actually the Networks, who are the Major Media companies (who have the billions) and who own only a relatively small percentage of the nations broadcast stations (less than 10% IIRC). The second tier in that group, IMO, consists of the top thirty markets non network 0wned affiliates, who might have millions, though they do pay for the networks programming. There are many other lower tier broadcasters who actually own the majority of stations and where profits are from moderate to non existent. Those Broadcasters have very little in common with the Media Networks and those who are the Network affiliates also pay the networks for the use of their programming; in past years networks actually paid the station owners compensation to carry there programs. And, don't forget the PBS network, a completely different model. As an aside: IMHO there is nothing improper about passing a share of these Network programming costs on to the Cable companies in the Transmission Consent negotiations. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.