[AR] Re: Future Exploration Policy (was Re: Re: Congrats SpaceX

  • From: Henry Vanderbilt <hvanderbilt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 14:11:13 -0700

On 2/8/2018 8:30 AM, Henry Spencer wrote:

On Wed, 7 Feb 2018, Henry Vanderbilt wrote:
Henry Spencer wrote:
It will take time for a substantial heavylift market to develop.

Time, or a high-volume government customer.  Say, a serious human deep-space exploration program that actually wanted to accomplish something interesting for the ~$4G/year that's the likely max politically-practical funding.

Even that will take time to materialize to the point that it's actually spending money on launches.  It has the strength that because it's a command economy, it can (in principle) make fast decisions, so at least you know the business is coming; it has the compensating weakness that it can also change its mind quickly later.

Looks to me SpaceX is in a good position to handle some lag in F9H demand ramping up, given the large backlog of regular F9 launches and the extremely high commonality between the two vehicle operations.

Almost like that was factored in to their "build it and the market will come" approach to developing F9H...

Henry V

Other related posts: