On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 4:37 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jonathan Blake wrote: >> >> (er) 217: under way -> underway >> >> Although "underway" seems to be valid as an adjective, the current >> usage is OK as-is. > > While it's not incorrect, it is non-standard: > > "under way": 2 occurrences in the books > > "underway" 9 occurrences +2 corrections from "under way" (01hh, 23mh) > > I would vote for this to be changed here and in 04tcod. Agreed. -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon