i'm at 1920 x 1200 and it is very small but still legible 2009/4/12 Benjamin I Krefetz <krefetz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Sun, 12 Apr 2009, Simon Osborne wrote: > >> On 12/04/2009 01:55, Jonathan Blake wrote: >>> >>> I got tired of looking at those Combat Results Table graphics that I >>> made years ago, so (instead of doing more important things) I revised >>> them into one new table: >>> >>> >>> http://www.projectaon.org/staff/jonathan/whole-combat-results-new-order.png >>> >>> I would like to use this in all of the books. Please let me know what >>> you think about its readability and aesthetics. >> >> Looks good to me. >> >> I would like some feedback on how it looks on other monitors/screen >> resolutions. I run my 17" flatscreen monitor at 1280x1024, and it looks a >> little small, but still legible. Would it work better if it was a little bit >> larger? Or is it OK at this size? > > And here I thought it was just me :) My laptop screen is set at 1680x1050, > and I thought the chart looked pretty small but legible. Perhaps not so > user-friendly for users with less than 20/20 vision. > > Ben > > ~~~~~~ > Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon > > > ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon