On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> (er) 57: power word -> word of power >>>>> [jb: correct as-is] >> >> I understand the desire to make it clear that this isn't _the_ Power >> Word, but I think the best course here is to leave it alone. > > To clarify: This should be Rejected, rather than <spell>Power Word</spell>, > then? Sorry, I'm not feeling too bright! >_< Yes, rejected. >>>>> (er) 234: Hold Enemy and -> Hold Enemy, and (for consistency; >>>>> this is how the commas are generally used in lw) [LM] >> >> I've changed my mind about this one (call me moody). It always struck >> me as fussy to add those commas even though I thought it was the >> correct thing to do. However, grammar is not an exact science and this >> reads fine as-is, especially when I saw the spell name italicized. >> That should be separation enough for a reader I think. > > So this should be Rejected and does not need a comma at all, not even after > <spell>Hold Enemy</spell>? Yes, the comma after Hold Enemy should be added. Sorry. -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon