Jonathan Blake wrote:
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:(er) 57: power word -> word of power [jb: correct as-is]I understand the desire to make it clear that this isn't _the_ Power Word, but I think the best course here is to leave it alone.To clarify: This should be Rejected, rather than <spell>Power Word</spell>, then? Sorry, I'm not feeling too bright! >_<Yes, rejected.
Marked as such.
(er) 234: Hold Enemy and -> Hold Enemy, and (for consistency; this is how the commas are generally used in lw) [LM]I've changed my mind about this one (call me moody). It always struck me as fussy to add those commas even though I thought it was the correct thing to do. However, grammar is not an exact science and this reads fine as-is, especially when I saw the spell name italicized. That should be separation enough for a reader I think.So this should be Rejected and does not need a comma at all, not even after <spell>Hold Enemy</spell>?Yes, the comma after Hold Enemy should be added. Sorry.
Fixed! Wolf's Bane currently stands at 0 outstanding issues. Time for a Comment Period? -- Simon Osborne Project Aon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon