Speaking very roughly, for every $1-10 M lost someone dies. They die
because we couldn't get the cancer treatment, or the process wasn't as safe
as it could be, etc. So by wiping out a trillion dollars, long term you
have kill 100k to 1m people unless we dig ourselves out.
Money is life people. Technology, even medical technology, doesn't matter
without the money to deploy it. And money is not something that can be
arbitrarily created or stolen. Theft and printing money destroys it, rather
than create it. Basic economics.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, 8:58 PM Jake Anderson <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Sorry dad, trumps stockmarket portfolio is going down so you need to die.
On 26/3/20 4:22 pm, roxanna Mason wrote:
Today one week later:
657 infections, 12 deaths, 43 recovered.
Were's the age vs deaths data? If it's disproportionately the elderly and
health
compromised then maybe its time to get back to work and let herd
immunity do its job.
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:23 PM Henry Spencer <hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:26 AM ken mason <laserpro1234@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Observation: One of the largest population
country with the lowest infection rate is India -
Over a billion people with only 244 infected 5
deaths 20 received. Why?
India and Pakistan are now both on lockdown, desperately hoping to
flatten
the peak enough that their limited medical resources can more-or-less
cope. It hasn't been done particularly skillfully in either country, and
they've got big problems with very large numbers of poor people who don't
have enough safety margin to handle being out of work for weeks, but
they're trying.
Henry