I guess the equations are different in America than the rest of the world.
So much freedom.
Should we kill you if I can prove it's good for the economy too?
On 26/3/20 6:08 pm, David Summers wrote:
Speaking very roughly, for every $1-10 M lost someone dies. They die because we couldn't get the cancer treatment, or the process wasn't as safe as it could be, etc. So by wiping out a trillion dollars, long term you have kill 100k to 1m people unless we dig ourselves out.
Money is life people. Technology, even medical technology, doesn't matter without the money to deploy it. And money is not something that can be arbitrarily created or stolen. Theft and printing money destroys it, rather than create it. Basic economics.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020, 8:58 PM Jake Anderson <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Sorry dad, trumps stockmarket portfolio is going down so you need
to die.
On 26/3/20 4:22 pm, roxanna Mason wrote:
Today one week later:
657 infections, 12 deaths, 43 recovered.
Were's the age vs deaths data? If it's disproportionately the
elderly and health
compromised then maybe its time to get back to work and let herd
immunity do its job.
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 3:23 PM Henry Spencer
<hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:hspencer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 10:26 AM ken mason
<laserpro1234@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:laserpro1234@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
> Observation: One of the largest population
> country with the lowest infection rate is India -
> Over a billion people with only 244 infected 5
> deaths 20 received. Why?
India and Pakistan are now both on lockdown, desperately
hoping to flatten
the peak enough that their limited medical resources can
more-or-less
cope. It hasn't been done particularly skillfully in either
country, and
they've got big problems with very large numbers of poor
people who don't
have enough safety margin to handle being out of work for
weeks, but
they're trying.
Henry