[AR] Re: Mills Fuel Experiment
- From: David Spain <david.l.spain@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 14:46:12 -0400
On 3/20/2015 1:27 PM, James Bowery wrote:
Arguing against arithmetic showing specific energy that is orders of
magnitude lower than nuclear by parading a litany of rhetorical if not
polemical "wisdom", isn't even wrong.
James,
What is your stand on the viewpoint that because Mills' theory of
fractional Rydberg states are not square-integrable in the Dirac
expression, they are therefore to be considered in the quantum realm as
non-physical? That has been the traditional view at least until Jan
Nault's paper:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0507193.pdf
Also don't these n < 1 states lead to non-resonant wave function
solutions? (Isn't that just another way of stating the above?)
Dave
Other related posts: