[AR] Re: Mills Fuel Experiment
- From: James Bowery <jabowery@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:52:58 -0500
Erratum: AWG -> AHW (Atomic Hydrogen Welding)
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:50 PM, James Bowery <jabowery@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Such questions are beyond my competence, which is why my approach is
> simple:
>
> Replace the 2 tungsten electrodes of an AWG rig with titanium and measure
> the resulting temperature.
>
> If the factor of 7 gain reported in the cite obtains, the result should be
> unambiguous.
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:46 PM, David Spain <david.l.spain@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/20/2015 1:27 PM, James Bowery wrote:
>>
>>> Arguing against arithmetic showing specific energy that is orders of
>>> magnitude lower than nuclear by parading a litany of rhetorical if not
>>> polemical "wisdom", isn't even wrong.
>>>
>>> James,
>>
>> What is your stand on the viewpoint that because Mills' theory of
>> fractional Rydberg states are not square-integrable in the Dirac
>> expression, they are therefore to be considered in the quantum realm as
>> non-physical? That has been the traditional view at least until Jan Nault's
>> paper:
>>
>> http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0507193.pdf
>>
>> Also don't these n < 1 states lead to non-resonant wave function
>> solutions? (Isn't that just another way of stating the above?)
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Other related posts: