[AR] Re: Mills Fuel Experiment
- From: James Bowery <jabowery@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket <arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:50:17 -0500
Such questions are beyond my competence, which is why my approach is simple:
Replace the 2 tungsten electrodes of an AWG rig with titanium and measure
the resulting temperature.
If the factor of 7 gain reported in the cite obtains, the result should be
unambiguous.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:46 PM, David Spain <david.l.spain@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> On 3/20/2015 1:27 PM, James Bowery wrote:
>
>> Arguing against arithmetic showing specific energy that is orders of
>> magnitude lower than nuclear by parading a litany of rhetorical if not
>> polemical "wisdom", isn't even wrong.
>>
>> James,
>
> What is your stand on the viewpoint that because Mills' theory of
> fractional Rydberg states are not square-integrable in the Dirac
> expression, they are therefore to be considered in the quantum realm as
> non-physical? That has been the traditional view at least until Jan Nault's
> paper:
>
> http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0507193.pdf
>
> Also don't these n < 1 states lead to non-resonant wave function
> solutions? (Isn't that just another way of stating the above?)
>
> Dave
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts: