[AR] Re: Mills Fuel Experiment
- From: Ian Woollard <ian.woollard@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: arocket@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 15:47:55 +0000
A lower ground state of hydrogen that can be reached at low energy?
Nah.
If hydrinos existed, huge amounts of hydrogen in the universe should
already be hydrinos. We should be knee deep in the stuff. It should form,
and be very stable.
Where the heck is all this stuff if it exists?
Nowhere, because it's nonsense, sorry.
On 20 March 2015 at 21:52, James Bowery <jabowery@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Erratum: AWG -> AHW (Atomic Hydrogen Welding)
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:50 PM, James Bowery <jabowery@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Such questions are beyond my competence, which is why my approach is
>> simple:
>>
>> Replace the 2 tungsten electrodes of an AWG rig with titanium and measure
>> the resulting temperature.
>>
>> If the factor of 7 gain reported in the cite obtains, the result should
>> be unambiguous.
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:46 PM, David Spain <david.l.spain@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/20/2015 1:27 PM, James Bowery wrote:
>>>
>>>> Arguing against arithmetic showing specific energy that is orders of
>>>> magnitude lower than nuclear by parading a litany of rhetorical if not
>>>> polemical "wisdom", isn't even wrong.
>>>>
>>>> James,
>>>
>>> What is your stand on the viewpoint that because Mills' theory of
>>> fractional Rydberg states are not square-integrable in the Dirac
>>> expression, they are therefore to be considered in the quantum realm as
>>> non-physical? That has been the traditional view at least until Jan Nault's
>>> paper:
>>>
>>> http://arxiv.org/pdf/physics/0507193.pdf
>>>
>>> Also don't these n < 1 states lead to non-resonant wave function
>>> solutions? (Isn't that just another way of stating the above?)
>>>
>>> Dave
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
-Ian Woollard
Other related posts: