[vicsireland] Re: debate on vics and E.G.M

  • From: "Ed Harper" <goat@xxxxxx>
  • To: <vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 16:01:26 +0100

Could I make a suggestion.   If vics decided to windup activities other than 
the mailing list, could that be kept open and anyone interested in helping 
other computer users could at least remain as members of the list.   Living 
where i do I have never attended an A or Egm, but I have been to a tech day at 
UCC in Cork and had invaluable help from the list and also learned a lot, 
without even asking questions through reading others emails.   I am 95% certain 
I won't make the meeting because I won't have cover on the farm, so can't leave 
home, but that doesn't show a lack of interest.

Ed
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Kerie Doyle 
  To: vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 12:16 PM
  Subject: [vicsireland] Re: debate on vics and E.G.M


  Martin has summed up the view point of the committee fantastically. Couldn't 
have written it better myself. 
  I would also say at this point, following on from Martin's email, that if 
only the committee are in attendance at the meeting then it will not bode well 
for the future of vics, so something to think about. 
  Thanks 
  Kerie 

  Sent from my iPhone

  On 7 Apr 2014, at 09:49 a.m., Martin Fleming <martinfleming01@xxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:


    Hi Gerry,



    I would be in support of Kerie just like Cearbhall especially in view of 
the issue of a physical meeting.  I have provided responses to your questions 
shown at the end of each point but please remember that these are my views and 
thoughts and not necessarily the views of others on the committee.  I don't 
know if anyone else will provide answers to these points and the lengthy Email 
but I hope this provides enough to consider.



    1.  Regarding the meeting, Kerie, I hear what you are saying but I strongly 
request that you consider my suggestion.  I don't know the numbers of members 
but I'm sure that if you review the membership, you will note that there are a 
large contingent of people who have  or do not attend regularly, on the basis 
that they feel the effort involved in making the meeting i.e. trains, taxis a 
few hours in Dublin would be too great an effort.  This is no reflection on you 
or any committee members just that they have no aspirations to be on committees 
but would be willing to work with the committee on projects on an email 
basis.I'd paraphrase this in saying that varying levels of vision and mobility 
either enhance or hinder individuals - People please don't be insulted as this 
is an observation.



    Response:

    I would agree that there is a large number of members that do not attend 
meetings or events but I am not convinced you have any basis for the reason 
because it isnot purely to do with just the EGM/AGM type meetings it extends to 
involvement or attendance to events being run.  The lack of this attendance and 
interest is why Kerie put that message out originally asking for ideas of what 
the membership wants so that perhaps the committee could better serve its 
members with events or such like in other areas of the country as well as just 
Dublin.  So if your arguement was correct then there would have been more 
response to the original request with suggestions to host things in other areas 
etc.  I myself am in Mayo and do find that journey myself inconvenient for the 
general reason that everything, not only VICS events, are centred and held in 
Dublin as if that was the centre of the universe, but if there is something I 
really wish to attend or in this case something that is very important to me 
then I will make that extra effort.



    2.  I mentioned the website, and Cearbhall


     explained that it was an experiment by a sub committee.  O.K. but isn't it 
  a basic task of the committee to keep such tasks updated as part of 
housekeeping if the capability is available to it?



    Response: 

    There has been several discussion on this and how to progress with this 
especially as the maintainance/development side of it, I believe, is quite 
complicated involving some knowledge of the paticlular web development tool, so 
with that in mind it depends on how skilled the committee or the person 
assigned that task is for implementing features and facilities on the site.  
Perhaps as was previously mentioned the site should just purely be a basic one 
giving just the sufficient information on the society and how to contact them 
etc. but just to clarify it has been discussed.



    3.  As a matter of point to the mailing list, Most queries are answered by 
other members but I did notice a request for information on windows 8 and menus 
on webpages recently which didn't receiveany response.  I was tempted to reply 
giving my thoughts which were unexperienced due to only experiencing win 8 by 
chance and being an X.P. user myself.Shouldn't there be some mechanism by which 
the knowledgable members of the committee would intervene and provide info.



    Response:

    You are making assumptions that all members on the committee have all the 
knowledge on all topics which is not necessarily true and also an unfair 
responsibility to place on them to be experts in all areas of IT and computing. 
 The society is made up of computing professionals and general users that would 
not have certain knowledge and so it is therefore fair to say that if the 
society is made up in this way that the committee is equally made up in that 
way.  I am not saying that there wasn't anyone on the list who could have 
provided the answer but perhaps there wasn't either, however it again just 
shows the lack of responses and interest in certain aspects of the group if 
there was the people out there.



    4.  You stated that you emailed the list at the beginning of the year for 
ideas but nothing came out of it.  Shouldn't there be some kind of consensis 
among the committee at the beginning of the year on areas to be covered or 
projects to develop during the year.  There is a diverse range of abilities 
among the list members whom I'm sure would work with committee inspired 
projects, if they were approached. 



    Response:

    You are correct in your assumption of the discussion at the beginning of a 
committee's year that there are topics and areas that might be looked at but as 
was stated with the meetings and events respons it is not easy to lead an 
organisation unless you know what is of interest to it's members because if a 
committee just goes off and does what it thinks is worth doing then if not 
wanted by the membership can create the impression that the committee don't 
care about what the other members want from the society.  So it is fine the 
committee having ideas and be involved in ongoing projects but to have input 
from the membership and involvement at, as already mentioned, events and 
meetings would mean that the committee would at least field they have something 
to lead and that they aren't just flogging a dead horse.



    5.  Is the basis of the computer society eroded so much that it is easier 
to such the web for answers than to develop what we have.  Simple answer Yes, 
so what is the point, such an attitude

    could have been taken years ago.  success comes with effort.



    Response:

    Yes, "success comes with effort" but it is not that the effort hasn't been 
put in to it over the past years but again you can only work with what you have 
and if that isn't anything or much then it is hard to progress and become 
successful.  There are loads of places to get answers on the web now even in 
the relm of assistive tech but again the committee can only fill a need if they 
no what that need is, so if the society is to continue then the committee needs 
to no what is needed by the members.  Another point to a successful 
organisation is that it needs to be able to evolve and change but again this is 
not possible unless needs of the group are identified and the way things are 
perhaps run are known such as if VICS runs just training events or do they 
become more social, or a mix of the two and how that is all structured in 
conjunction to the actual needs of the group too.



    6.  Observing the responses to date, I believe that the numbers involved 
have reduced in the society.  A committee has to consider where to canvas for 
new sources of members, did the committee consider this point?



    Response:

    The short and straightforward answer to this is Yes.  The trend that these 
questions are following are a lot of assumptions and as someone who hasn't  
been involved in the committee and meetings you have no idea of what has or 
hasn't been discussed and it is wrong and unfair of you to make assumptions and 
judgements of such a type.  Perhaps if you stood for the committee and 
experienced the situation from that side then you may have a better 
appreciation of how things are.  As they say if you want to understand someone 
then walk a mile in their shoes.



    7.  What relationships or association has the society built up with other 
groups, industry user groups ovr the years and what is the position presently.



    Response:

    I am unsure of all the contacts/connection built up so can't give you a 
great answer to this, as I am only an ordinary committee member, but I can tell 
you that connection with the British Computer Association of the Blind (BCAB) 
has been established and I mention this particular organisation as they are the 
closest group to what we would be.  Despite this connection we have to take in 
to consideration that they are a UK group and so any dealings with them would 
not make a lot of difference to our everyday running and development.



    8. In my reading of the constitution, you have to contact members at least 
3 weeks previous to any meeting.  Besides putting a notice on the mailing list, 
Did the committee or you email all the members of vicsireland individually to 
ensure that they are aware of the meeting?



    Response:

    I can not answer for the Membership Secretary or the Chair but I am sure 
that they will have done what they could to have provided notification to the 
members.  It was in good time and as you are such an advocate of the list and 
how much people use or rely on it then if the list was the only place this was 
announced then this should have been adequate for the majority.



    9.  I've read the constitution and it covers a great deal.   My original 
observation in that I believe that a committee should be the driving force 
rather than leaving it to the general membership is endorsed by the wording of 
the constitution: 

    2 AIMS & OBJECTIVES

    list of 6 items

    1.  To meet the needs of visually impaired

    people in the area of general computer access.

    2.  To provide support to those who are new to

    computers.

    3.  To encourage employers to hire visually

    impaired employees enabled by new technology.

    4.  To promote and where possible, assist in the

    development of adaptive technology, and to encourage developers of new 
software

    and hardware to ensure accessibility.

    5.  To act in an advisory capacity to bodies

    seeking to provide access to electronic data.

    6.  To advise on, and promote the development of

    fully accessible websites.

    There is plenty of topics that would keep any committee busy.   Can you 
provide any updates on recent developments under any of the headings?



    Response:

    We again come back to the same point that yes a committee is there to lead 
but it can only do so by knowing what is needed.  At no stage has it been 
implied that the running of the society is going to be left to the members but 
the committee needs to be able to run something.  In relation to the 
points/avenues that could be looked at, as you suggest, above you have to 
remember that some of these are now undertaken by other organisations such as 
NCBI and other bodies.  I am not going to address each point individually as 
this reply is turning in to a novel already, but the committee again can look 
at some of these areas that may not be addressed by other organisations/groups 
but they will need to know if that is what the membership want from the society 
because it could drastically change the group for some people resulting in a 
larger membership fall out, if what you suggested earlier is correct that there 
seems to be a drop in membership.


    9. The constitution states that:  2.  Nominations may be made for persons 
not

    present at the meeting, on receipt of written approval from the nominee.  
This in itself opens the door to having a meeting on line as if a person is 
nominated and accepted while not being there, they are being confirmed as part 
of the working group i.e. committee



    Response:

    This does not give justification for an online or Email meeting as it 
depends on one's interpretation.  I would say that this is an indication that 
the committee is able to receive proposals with nominations/seconders and the 
same for people looking to stand for the committee by Email if they can't 
attend, and they can all be taken in to account that day and voted on by the 
attendies on the day but it doesn't mean it can all happen online.  If it was a 
commercial organisation with shareholders then when they hold thir AGM you 
would recieve an invitation to the meeting and if you couldn't attend then you 
would have a nominee form with the people standing or you can provide 
authorization of vote to the Chair to decide on your behalf as a proxy vote.  
So again there is no reason why a physical meeting is out of the question.



      10. Cearbhall suggest a project in developing the open source software 
i.e. programs like Open office, mozilla, linox, N.V.D.A.  This is a very 
interesting idea.  personally I wouldn't be great with the ligistics involved, 
we could develop such a package on the basis that it could be applied to the 
lower cost tablets for assisting individuals getting accustomed to technology.



    Response:

    As has been expressed before by several people this is a good and 
constructive suggestion which if the society continues could be looked in to 
further as an option.



    11.  What would people's attitude be to paid advertising on the website to 
create a finance stream.   The funds created could be used to finance 
accessibility awards for design competitions for accessible software or 
rewarding companies who make their websites accessible.  School competitions to 
develop accessible apps for USE BY BLIND PEOPLE OR BLIND USERS TO DEVELOP APPS. 
 This thought comes from the recent email from Ronan 



    Response:

    Some good ideas here too and in the long list of points/comments raised 
until now probably some of the most constructive suggestions for input to how 
we as a organisation can survive and change/develop.  If VICS does continue 
then I am sure there are some very good ideas here, however the only thing I 
would say about the web ads idea is that it will require someone who has web 
analytic skills and optimisation skills too so this maybe or may not be 
possible depending on the skill set of the group/committee.



    12.  So, If I nominate and get a seconder for someone who might not be 
there on the day Will it be accepted?



    Response:

    As a short and my own answer to this, not representative of the whole 
committee, would be yes I am sure it would be.



    13.  Damien suggested to Kerie that he would help with an agendafor the 
meetingAlas Kerie says that there is only 1 item to be discussed:  there are 
twelve items above to be considered.



    Response:

    You have made 12 items however as you can see throughout these there is a 
common theme of input and involvement by the membership for the current or 
future committees to know the needs and wants of the membership.  If we use a 
computing analogy then if you input nothing to a computer don't expect anything 
to be output, and if you provide limit input then it will provide you with a 
limit result.  I have been both a software designer and tester and in both 
situations if you don't have enough input then the results are limitted.  
Without all specifications and requirements from the customer the developer 
doesn't know what to produce, and won't produce the correct application for the 
client.  If you are only told to test for certain things then you will miss 
many other things and the results will not be complete.  So although the 
committee is to run the organisation it needs to know what members want from 
them and how/what they want from the organisation.  Kerie is still correct that 
there is one main topic to discuss and that is the future of VICS but from this 
discussion, using some of the constructive input given, will determine this 
future and development of the group.



    14.  Martin pointed out to me that in the event of voting a separate email 
would have to be used for all the votes. I think this would be fine,  once the 
motion is in the header people can reply to the motion with yes or no. 
Alternatively, an email containing the motions can be forwarded to the 
individuals on the list and they can put their preferred option in quotes 
beside it.  



    Response:

    I can not answer for the Chair or the rest of the committee on this point 
but if proposals/motions are raised and voted on by members who can't attend 
via Email then I'm sure this will be fine, but again it is no excuse for people 
not to attend the physical meeting if at all possible otherwise this is just a 
cope out for any proper involvement.  This method could be used but it doesn't 
mean that the committee or the specific committee member assigned to this task 
can be swamped by everyone just because they don't want to attend because if it 
turns out to be that the committee are the only ones to make the physical 
meeting then it will also still give the impression that noone is 
interested/borthered enough about VICS to make the effort.



    This has been a long reply providing my view on things and not necessarily 
the view of the whole committee but I hope that I have been able to answer some 
of the points raised here and that I have given a reasonable representation for 
the committee.  I would however thank you for being thorough in this Email, 
despite it's length, as it has at least shown some passion of one member of 
VICS in what they want from the organisation and it's future.  It is just a 
shame that it hasn't sparked any more interest from other members of VICS to 
contribute to this thread/discussion, and that being said then this poses the 
question whether an online voting/meeting would have worked anyway due to the 
lack of responses.



    Kind regards



    Martin



    From: vicsireland-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:vicsireland-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of GERARD SHANAHAN
    Sent: 06 April 2014 20:23
    To: vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: [vicsireland] debate on vics and E.G.M



    Hi All, 



    Back again to try and whet your appetites for a debate on the topics of 
having the meeting online and the future of vicsireland website and list.



    1.  Regarding the meeting, Kerie, I hear what you are saying but I strongly 
request that you consider my suggestion.  I don't know the numbers of members 
but I'm sure that if you review the membership, you will note that there are a 
large contingent of people who have  or do not attend regularly, on the basis 
that they feel the effort involved in making the meeting i.e. trains, taxis a 
few hours in Dublin would be too great an effort.  This is no reflection on you 
or any committee members just that they have no aspirations to be on committees 
but would be willing to work with the committee on projects on an email 
basis.I'd paraphrase this in saying that varying levels of vision and mobility 
either enhance or hinder individuals - People please don't be insulted as this 
is an observation.



    2.  I mentioned the website, and Cearbhall



     explained that it was an experiment by a sub committee.  O.K. but isn't it 
  a basic task of the committee to keep such tasks updated as part of 
housekeeping if the capability is available to it?



    3.  As a matter of point to the mailing list, Most queries are answered by 
other members but I did notice a request for information on windows 8 and menus 
on webpages recently which didn't receiveany response.  I was tempted to reply 
giving my thoughts which were unexperienced due to only experiencing win 8 by 
chance and being an X.P. user myself.Shouldn't there be some mechanism by which 
the knowledgable members of the committee would intervene and provide info.

    4.  You stated that you emailed the list at the beginning of the year for 
ideas but nothing came out of it.  Shouldn't there be some kind of consensis 
among the committee at the beginning of the year on areas to be covered or 
projects to develop during the year.  There is a diverse range of abilities 
among the list members whom I'm sure would work with committee inspired 
projects, if they were approached. 

    5.  Is the basis of the computer society eroded so much that it is easier 
to such the web for answers than to develop what we have.  Simple answer Yes, 
so what is the point, such an attitude

    could have been taken years ago.  success comes with effort.

    6.  Observing the responses to date, I believe that the numbers involved 
have reduced in the society.  A committee has to consider where to canvas for 
new sources of members, did the committee consider this point?



    7.  What relationships or association has the society built up with other 
groups, industry user groups ovr the years and what is the position presently.

    8. In my reading of the constitution, you have to contact members at least 
3 weeks previous to any meeting.  Besides putting a notice on the mailing list, 
Did the committee or you email all the members of vicsireland individually to 
ensure that they are aware of the meeting?

    9.  I've read the constitution and it covers a great deal.   My original 
observation in that I believe that a committee should be the driving force 
rather than leaving it to the general membership is endorsed by the wording of 
the constitution: 

    2 AIMS & OBJECTIVES
    list of 6 items
    1.  To meet the needs of visually impaired
    people in the area of general computer access.
    2.  To provide support to those who are new to
    computers.
    3.  To encourage employers to hire visually
    impaired employees enabled by new technology.
    4.  To promote and where possible, assist in the
    development of adaptive technology, and to encourage developers of new 
software
    and hardware to ensure accessibility.
    5.  To act in an advisory capacity to bodies
    seeking to provide access to electronic data.
    6.  To advise on, and promote the development of
    fully accessible websites.

    There is plenty of topics that would keep any committee busy.   Can you 
provide any updates on recent developments under any of the headings?



    9. The constitution states that:  2.  Nominations may be made for persons 
not
    present at the meeting, on receipt of written approval from the nominee.  
This in itself opens the door to having a meeting on line as if a person is 
nominated and accepted while not being there, they are being confirmed as part 
of the working group i.e. committee
      10. Cearbhall suggest a project in developing the open source software 
i.e. programs like Open office, mozilla, linox, N.V.D.A.  This is a very 
interesting idea.  personally I wouldn't be great with the ligistics involved, 
we could develop such a package on the basis that it could be applied to the 
lower cost tablets for assisting individuals getting accustomed to technology.

    11.  What would people's attitude be to paid advertising on the website to 
create a finance stream.   The funds created could be used to finance 
accessibility awards for design competitions for accessible software or 
rewarding companies who make their websites accessible.  School competitions to 
develop accessible apps for USE BY BLIND PEOPLE OR BLIND USERS TO DEVELOP APPS. 
 This thought comes from the recent email from Ronan 

    12.  So, If I nominate and get a seconder for someone who might not be 
there on the day Will it be accepted?

    13.  Damien suggested to Kerie that he would help with an agendafor the 
meetingAlas Kerie says that there is only 1 item to be discussed:  there are 
twelve items above to be considered.

    14.  Martin pointed out to me that in the event of voting a separate email 
would have to be used for all the votes. I think this would be fine,  once the 
motion is in the header people can reply to the motion with yes or no. 
Alternatively, an email containing the motions can be forwarded to the 
individuals on the list and they can put their preferred option in quotes 
beside it.  




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

    I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter.
    SPAMfighter has removed 559 of my spam emails to date.

    Do you have a slow PC? Try a free scan! 




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! 
Antivirus protection is active. 
         

Other related posts: