[vicsireland] Re: debate on vics and E.G.M

  • From: pat mccarthy <patmk1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:56:53 +0100

in my opinion the problem with this group is it does very little else except 
the email group and this group has helped me so much in the past– I hope it 
continues.

I think the important thing is is there anybody reading this email who has the 
time to 1

get more blind people to join the group

two

have the time to do anything else which might help this group
Gerard I think your ideas are very good and if you have the time and 
inclination to join the committee you will have my support

Sent from my iPhone

> On 7 Apr 2014, at 08:34 a.m., "Kerie Doyle" <kerie.doyle1987@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Tim, 
> Thanks for confirming this. 
> Much appreciated. 
> Kerie 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 7 Apr 2014, at 08:29 a.m., Tim Culhane <tim.j.culhane@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Gerry,
>>  
>> Just in response to a couple of your points:
>>  
>>  
>> 8. In my reading of the constitution, you have to contact members at least 3 
>> weeks previous to any meeting.  Besides putting a notice on the mailing 
>> list, Did the committee or you email all the members of vicsireland 
>> individually to ensure that they are aware of the meeting?
>>  
>>  
>> All members are subscribed to the list, so there is no need to contact every 
>> person individually to make them aware of the EGM.  I do believe that this 
>> has always been the way that members have been made aware of meetings.
>> As the list moderator I can verify that 97 people are currently subscribed 
>> to the list.  A person has to be a fully paid up member before they can be 
>> subscribed to the list.
>>  
>> 12.  So, If I nominate and get a seconder for someone who might not be there 
>> on the day Will it be accepted?
>>  
>> Not sure what you mean by the above.  There are no elections to the 
>> committee to be held at the EGM, so why would anybody be nominated?  Of 
>> course, if a position needs to be filled on the committee then, of course, a 
>> person can be nominated and seconded and does not need to be present as long 
>> as they have given written consent in advance for the nomination.
>>  
>> Tim
>> From: vicsireland-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:vicsireland-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of GERARD SHANAHAN
>> Sent: 06 April 2014 20:23
>> To: vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [vicsireland] debate on vics and E.G.M
>>  
>> Hi All,
>>  
>> Back again to try and whet your appetites for a debate on the topics of 
>> having the meeting online and the future of vicsireland website and list.
>>  
>> 1.  Regarding the meeting, Kerie, I hear what you are saying but I strongly 
>> request that you consider my suggestion.  I don't know the numbers of 
>> members but I'm sure that if you review the membership, you will note that 
>> there are a large contingent of people who have  or do not attend regularly, 
>> on the basis that they feel the effort involved in making the meeting i.e. 
>> trains, taxis a few hours in Dublin would be too great an effort.  This is 
>> no reflection on you or any committee members just that they have no 
>> aspirations to be on committees but would be willing to work with the 
>> committee on projects on an email basis.I'd paraphrase this in saying that 
>> varying levels of vision and mobility either enhance or hinder individuals - 
>> People please don't be insulted as this is an observation.
>>  
>> 2.  I mentioned the website, and Cearbhall
>>  
>>  explained that it was an experiment by a sub committee.  O.K. but isn't it  
>>  a basic task of the committee to keep such tasks updated as part of 
>> housekeeping if the capability is available to it?
>>  
>> 3.  As a matter of point to the mailing list, Most queries are answered by 
>> other members but I did notice a request for information on windows 8 and 
>> menus on webpages recently which didn't receiveany response.  I was tempted 
>> to reply giving my thoughts which were unexperienced due to only 
>> experiencing win 8 by chance and being an X.P. user myself.Shouldn't there 
>> be some mechanism by which the knowledgable members of the committee would 
>> intervene and provide info.
>> 4.  You stated that you emailed the list at the beginning of the year for 
>> ideas but nothing came out of it.  Shouldn't there be some kind of consensis 
>> among the committee at the beginning of the year on areas to be covered or 
>> projects to develop during the year.  There is a diverse range of abilities 
>> among the list members whom I'm sure would work with committee inspired 
>> projects, if they were approached. 
>> 5.  Is the basis of the computer society eroded so much that it is easier to 
>> such the web for answers than to develop what we have.  Simple answer Yes, 
>> so what is the point, such an attitude
>> could have been taken years ago.  success comes with effort.
>> 6.  Observing the responses to date, I believe that the numbers involved 
>> have reduced in the society.  A committee has to consider where to canvas 
>> for new sources of members, did the committee consider this point?
>>  
>> 7.  What relationships or association has the society built up with other 
>> groups, industry user groups ovr the years and what is the position 
>> presently.
>> 8. In my reading of the constitution, you have to contact members at least 3 
>> weeks previous to any meeting.  Besides putting a notice on the mailing 
>> list, Did the committee or you email all the members of vicsireland 
>> individually to ensure that they are aware of the meeting?
>> 9.  I've read the constitution and it covers a great deal.   My original 
>> observation in that I believe that a committee should be the driving force 
>> rather than leaving it to the general membership is endorsed by the wording 
>> of the constitution: 
>> 2 AIMS & OBJECTIVES
>> list of 6 items
>> 1.  To meet the needs of visually impaired
>> people in the area of general computer access.
>> 2.  To provide support to those who are new to
>> computers.
>> 3.  To encourage employers to hire visually
>> impaired employees enabled by new technology.
>> 4.  To promote and where possible, assist in the
>> development of adaptive technology, and to encourage developers of new 
>> software
>> and hardware to ensure accessibility.
>> 5.  To act in an advisory capacity to bodies
>> seeking to provide access to electronic data.
>> 6.  To advise on, and promote the development of
>> fully accessible websites.
>> There is plenty of topics that would keep any committee busy.   Can you 
>> provide any updates on recent developments under any of the headings?
>>  
>> 9. The constitution states that:  2.  Nominations may be made for persons not
>> present at the meeting, on receipt of written approval from the nominee.  
>> This in itself opens the door to having a meeting on line as if a person is 
>> nominated and accepted while not being there, they are being confirmed as 
>> part of the working group i.e. committee
>>   10. Cearbhall suggest a project in developing the open source software 
>> i.e. programs like Open office, mozilla, linox, N.V.D.A.  This is a very 
>> interesting idea.  personally I wouldn't be great with the ligistics 
>> involved, we could develop such a package on the basis that it could be 
>> applied to the lower cost tablets for assisting individuals getting 
>> accustomed to technology.
>> 11.  What would people's attitude be to paid advertising on the website to 
>> create a finance stream.   The funds created could be used to finance 
>> accessibility awards for design competitions for accessible software or 
>> rewarding companies who make their websites accessible.  School competitions 
>> to develop accessible apps for USE BY BLIND PEOPLE OR BLIND USERS TO DEVELOP 
>> APPS.  This thought comes from the recent email from Ronan
>> 12.  So, If I nominate and get a seconder for someone who might not be there 
>> on the day Will it be accepted?
>> 13.  Damien suggested to Kerie that he would help with an agendafor the 
>> meetingAlas Kerie says that there is only 1 item to be discussed:  there are 
>> twelve items above to be considered.
>> 14.  Martin pointed out to me that in the event of voting a separate email 
>> would have to be used for all the votes. I think this would be fine,  once 
>> the motion is in the header people can reply to the motion with yes or no. 
>> Alternatively, an email containing the motions can be forwarded to the 
>> individuals on the list and they can put their preferred option in quotes 
>> beside it. 
>>  
>> I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter.
>> SPAMfighter has removed 559 of my spam emails to date.
>> 
>> Do you have a slow PC? Try a free scan! 

Other related posts: