On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thomas Wolmer wrote: >> >> 2008/10/12 Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> Jonathan Blake wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> (er) 01gstw:86: You repeat your prophecy to Shan [LM: You didn't >>>>> necessarily use Prophecy] [cf. >>>>> 136 -> 61 -> 86] -> "You repeat your prophecy to Shan, and..." >>>> >>>> Well that's a thorny one. Any suggestions? Footnote? >>> >>> I've added a footnote: "It is possible to arrive here without having used >>> the Power of Prophecy." There seems to be no easy way to prevent arrival >>> here for those who did not use Prophecy, nor any straightforward way of >>> removing this inconsistency. >> >> But what would this "prophecy" be? Using the Power of Prophecy in this >> situation only tells you of a "death from above", and then in Section >> 61, whether you use Prophecy or not, both you and Shan spot what it's >> all about, and you seem to be aware of that the Quoku are dangerous. I >> don't think it makes sense at all... > > I agree, but without partially rewriting at least one of the sections > there's not an easy way to resolve this. And the footnote would still be > required. :-/ prophecy -> apprehensions (?) -- Jon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon