Jonathan Blake wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Thomas Wolmer wrote:2008/10/12 Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:Jonathan Blake wrote:On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Simon Osborne <outspaced@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:(er) 01gstw:86: You repeat your prophecy to Shan [LM: You didn't necessarily use Prophecy] [cf. 136 -> 61 -> 86] -> "You repeat your prophecy to Shan, and..."Well that's a thorny one. Any suggestions? Footnote?I've added a footnote: "It is possible to arrive here without having used the Power of Prophecy." There seems to be no easy way to prevent arrival here for those who did not use Prophecy, nor any straightforward way of removing this inconsistency.But what would this "prophecy" be? Using the Power of Prophecy in this situation only tells you of a "death from above", and then in Section 61, whether you use Prophecy or not, both you and Shan spot what it's all about, and you seem to be aware of that the Quoku are dangerous. I don't think it makes sense at all...I agree, but without partially rewriting at least one of the sections there's not an easy way to resolve this. And the footnote would still be required. :-/prophecy -> apprehensions (?)
Or perhaps, "You convey your unease to Shan..." -- Simon Osborne Project Aon ~~~~~~ Manage your subscription at http://www.freelists.org/list/projectaon