Craig Birkmaier wrote: > And this is critical to the discussion. > > With 8-VSB, broadcasters are locked into their current > business model. The only change is that they can to a > limited extent try multicasting, however, there are virtually > no receivers to multicast to. With COFDM they could have > launched new services with receivers that actually worked. I agree with the general premise that broadcasters need flexibility, but I don't believe anymore that it is 8-VSB's lack of flexibility that is causing the DTT stagnation in the US. One simple example: A-VSB is absolutely NO MORE of a kludge than is DVB-H. It is also NO MORE of a kludge than is HM mode in COFDM. From the technical aspects of it, it is the same sort of solution done in a somewhat different way, with its own very distinct advantages (e.g. the robust channels can be varied in capacity to a much greater degree than HM). The fact that improved 4th/5th gen hardware mysteriously fails to become widely available and the fact that E-VSB or A-VSB may equally fail to appear in widespread use are all symptoms of the same disease. The same disease that would keep any COFDM innovation away from FOTA DTT in the US. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.